Evan Skamarock’s Summer Research Project in Nepal

We asked Evan Skamarock, one of our two student summer research award winners, to tell us a little bit about his project. Here’s what he had to say:

In early April 2012 I received a confirmation letter from the University of Puget Sound explaining that my project “Migrant Remittances in Rural Nepal” had been accepted for the Summer Research Grant program. The relief was outstanding. No longer in a frantic rush to find accommodations for the upcoming summer, I slowly began to prepare myself for the challenge ahead. Months earlier, I met regularly with Prof. Andrew Gardner to finalize my research plan for the summer grant. Our intention was straightforward: to craft a project that illuminates the experiences of households who send members abroad for work, and to place this understanding in conversation within the wider context of transnational migration studies. Whereas there has been a small abundance of research concerning the lives and troubles migrants experience in receiving countries, little work had been previously completed which examined the experiences of the households, families, relatives, and communities they leave behind. Accordingly, the project called for a specific type of data—evidence that is best derived from ethnographic methodology. Excited to get into “the thick of it,” I familiarized myself with existing literature on the topic and bided my time until the departure date. On June 2nd, my flight left SeaTac with the ultimate destination of Kathmandu International Airport.

Two days later, I found myself stepping off an airplane into the heat and humidity of Nepal’s largest city, Kathmandu. After navigating customs, and finding my checked luggage, I met with Deependra Giri, the research assistant with whom I would be working and living for the remainder of my time in Nepal. Driving from the airport into the heart of Kathmandu, I was overcome with the new sights, sounds, and smells.

My last day in Bhairahawa, surrounded by Deependra’s (in the blue) family. Note that it is uncommon for individuals to smile in Nepal while being the subject of a photograph.

After spending two nights in Kathmandu, we rode a night bus to Deependra’s location of residence. Situated on the central southern border of Nepal, Bhairahawa is an emerging modernized city with a population of around 100,000, and many more living in surrounding rural farming villages. Living in the house his grandfather constructed, Deependra resides with his joint family (a living arrangement where several generations live within the same domain—male members are usually blood related, bringing their wives to live with them). Surrounded by eight other family members, I was immediately taken with the kindness and support they provided me. After spending several days recovering from travels and becoming acclimated to my new home, we moved to begin our first interviews.

I quickly learned that June and July are not popular tourist travel dates in Nepal. During this period of time, Nepal experiences its hottest temperatures before the cooling rain of monsoon season. In the hot of midday, temperatures reached into the high 40 C (around 100-120F). The heat combined with intermittent energy outages, which happened sporadically every day for 3-6 hours. At first, I struggled to cope with the heat, having never experienced prolonged temperatures of that degree. However, the solution was simple (one endorsed by many of the Nepalese)—rest, relax and let go—do not carry high expectations during these times. Deependra and I, therefore, conducted interviews either in the morning, before 10am, or in the evening after 5, when the temperatures would allow for extended concentration. During these periods, with the aid of an interview guide, recording equipment, curiosity and our ethnographic intentions, we traveled by motorbike to the households of those with members abroad to listen and learn about their lives.

Living deep within the Terai plains region of southern Nepal for more than three generations, this family has recently opted to send a son abroad for work. However difficult life might be with one less pair of hands to contribute, they explained their excitement: the remittances received from migration have been put towards the construction of the brick foundation, upon which they aspire to build a house.

We conducted a total of twenty interviews over the forty-three day period. These informative sessions breached a diverse set of topics. Each household informed us of a diverse set of backgrounds and affiliations; we explored qualities ranging from economic situations, adherence to traditional/religious principles, and education levels, among many other categorical possibilities. However, there were some inter-interview concerns that became apparent. For instance, conducting interviews with a language barrier demanded attention to interpersonal communication stratagems: With the shared knowledge that neither the informant nor I can understand each other, is it appropriate to directly ask questions? Ought I instead address Deependra who will translate and act as an intermediary? By the time interview 10 rolled around, both Deependra and I settled into a comfortable understanding and balance.

Deependra, in blue, and Deepak, in white, during one of our household interviews.

As the story of each household unraveled before us, certain patterns and similarities became apparent. The experience of women (who more often than not, remained in Nepal while male relatives traveled abroad [although not exclusively; a point of interest in itself]) was one such arena. Traditional Nepalese gender roles dictate that the woman’s sphere is mainly in the household, acting as a domestic caretaker and mother. Part of this project’s goal is the exploration of change within the social structure and tradition. In this sense, ten years ago it would have been rare to observe a woman completing tasks outside the domestic domain, as this generally defines the accepted responsibilities and expectations in the male sphere. These same responsibilities remain after a household member migrates. In a shift away from traditional gender roles, women have become increasingly active in the public domain—shopping, paying bills, purchasing medicine, completing business responsibilities, and many other expressions. These changes call into question identity and agency: how might migratory practices influence what it means to be a Nepalese woman? How might these changes conflict with more traditional understandings of personhood? This is but one example of many instances where traditional practices and ways of living have changed due to work opportunities abroad.

A view from the bus traveling between Pokerah and Kathmandu. At this point in time, the monsoon season is in full swing. You can note the rice fields (filled with water). There were often vast irrigation systems to allow these spaces to fill with water, an impressive manipulation of the landscape.

After connecting with such a foreign and unique group of people, I have an intense desire to go back to Nepal and rekindle relationships built over the months I spent there. Believe it or not, the culture shock was more intense upon arrival into the States than it was in Nepal! After diving into another cultural way of life, it felt strange to come back to the conveniences of “modern” living. If there is one lesson that my experiences in Nepal fostered, it is to take nothing for granted!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s